News
June 11, 2024
Super Lawyers® Recognizes 11 Lawyers from Thomas, Thomas & Hafer
Thomas, Thomas & Hafer (“TT&H”) is proud to announce that for the year 2024, Super Lawyers® has recognized 11 lawyers from TT&H. Super Lawyers is a rating service of outstanding lawyers, from more than 70 practice areas, who have attained a high-degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. Lawyers are selected from all 50 states… read more
June 03, 2024
eNotes: Liability – June 2024 – Maryland
SIGNIFICANT CASE SUMMARIES Maryland Case Summary Boyd v. The Goodman-Gable Gould Co. Maryland Appellate Court No. 2089, September Term, 2022 Decided: March 11, 2024 Plaintiffs failed to establish damages, failed to establish that Defendant had intentionally misled them, and failed to establish that the contract between the parties was illusory. Background In 2016, the home… read more
May 03, 2024
TT&H Attorney Jamie DeSisto Wins Jury Verdict in Maryland Workers’ Compensation Appeal
TT&H attorney Jamie DeSisto prevailed in a jury trial on the Employer’s appeal from a decision of the Maryland Workers’ Compensation Commission to the Circuit Court, successfully arguing that the prior decision of the Commission was incorrect on the issue of causation of and entitlement to temporary total disability and medical treatment, including back surgery…. read more
May 01, 2024
eNotes: Liability – May 2024 – Maryland
SIGNIFICANT CASE SUMMARIES Maryland Case Summary Beahm v. Erie Ins. Exch. Maryland Appellate Court No. 1832, September Term 2022 Decided: January 30, 2024 Plaintiff, as an individual, was not entitled to coverage under his corporation’s automobile liability insurance policy, and Plaintiff failed to produce evidence that the insurer owed the necessary duty of care for… read more
April 19, 2024
eNotes: Workers’ Compensation – April 2024 – Maryland
SIGNIFICANT CASE SUMMARIES Maryland Case Summary In Re: Payton No. 1122, 2022 Term Maryland Court of Special Appeals Decided: March 4, 2024 No exceptions to the coming and going rule applied, rendering a claim non-compensable. Background: The Claimant, a police officer, drove to work and from the parking lot used a remote application to clock… read more