News
February 21, 2022
eNotes: Workers’ Compensation – February 2022 – West Virginia
SIGNIFICANT CASE SUMMARIES WV CASE SUMMARY Blue Flame Pipeline, LLC v. James Thomas State of West Virginia, Supreme Court of Appeals No. 20-0291 (Memorandum Decision) Decided: June 23, 2021 Even though the claims administrator never received a WC-1 Report of Injury, notice was sufficient under WV Code §23-4-15(a) because the claims administrator had actual notice… read more
February 21, 2022
eNotes – Workers’ Compensation – February 2022 – Washington, DC
SIGNFICANT CASE SUMMARIES DC CASE SUMMARY Howard University Hospital, et al. v. Lyles, et al. District of Columbia Court of Appeals No. 20-AA-405 Decided: January 27, 2022 When judging permanency, apportionment is not permitted for preexisting conditions allowed; whether Employers are entitled to a dollar-for-dollar credit for any previous permanency payments remains undecided Background Claimant… read more
February 21, 2022
eNotes: Workers’ Compensation – February 2022 – Maryland
SIGNIFICANT CASE SUMMARIES MD CASE SUMMARY Linda A. Sanders v. Board of Education of Harford County, et al In the Court of Appeals of Maryland Filed: December 17, 2021 A summary denial of a motion to reopen of modify under the Commission’s continuing jurisdiction is not subject to judicial review Background In 2015, the Commission… read more
February 21, 2022
eNotes: Workers’ Compensation – February 2022 – Pennsylvania
SIGNIFICANT CASE SUMMARIES PA CASE SUMMARIES Jamey Kamp v. Green Acres Contracting Co. (WCAB) Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania No. 1275 C.D. 2020 Decided: January 21, 2022 An employee who tripped and fell while on her way to purchase breakfast in a common area food court prior to the start of her shift was found to… read more
February 21, 2022
eNotes: Workers’ Compensation – February 2022 – Virginia
SIGNIFICANT CASE SUMMARIES VA CASE SUMMARY Schoenly v. Loudoun Stairs, Inc. Virginia Workers’ Compensation Commission VA00001453708 Decided: January 18, 2022 When a right knee replacement actually worsened the overall function of the knee, the permanency rating was judged after the replacement, fully disregarding a permanency rating taken before the replacement. Background Claimant suffered a meniscus… read more