News
March 01, 2018
TT&H eNotes: Liability – March 2018
FIRM NEWS The Legal Intelligencer publishes cyber security article by TT&H Attorneys. TT&H Attorneys Joe Cardile and Jeff Criswell were published in the February 8, 2018 online edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Pennsylvania’s premier legal publication. Their article, “Counseling Clients in the Aftermath of the Uber Data Breach,” discusses the 2016 data breach suffered by… read more
February 28, 2018
The Legal Intelligencer publishes cyber security article by TT&H Attorneys.
TT&H Attorneys Joe Cardile and Jeff Criswell were published in the February 8, 2018 online edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Pennsylvania’s premier legal publication. Their article, “Counseling Clients in the Aftermath of the Uber Data Breach,” discusses the 2016 data breach suffered by ride-sharing giant, Uber, which was not disclosed to the public until late… read more
February 28, 2018
Joe Cardile wins summary judgment in action claiming serious injuries arising from a dog attack.
In connection with a dog attack resulting in serious injuries, TT&H Attorney Joe Cardile won summary judgment for a defendant-landlord. The incident occurred while the Plaintiff was visiting a friend’s townhome, during which time a large Labrador Retriever allegedly escaped from the home of its owner and “aggressively lunged” at the Plaintiff, causing the Plaintiff… read more
February 23, 2018
Renita Collins’ tenacity wins summary judgment and defeats an appeal in a commercial policy coverage case.
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals dismissed an appeal and affirmed a summary judgment TT&H-Baltimore Attorney Renita L. Collins obtained in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County. The summary judgment dismissed claims brought by a business owner and former insured, wherein he alleged that his insurance company failed to properly notify him that his… read more
February 18, 2018
The Pennsylvania Superior Court revisits Tincher and its definition of product defect.
In 2014, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Tincher v. Omega Flex, 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014) (“Tincher I”). In Tincher I, the Supreme Court overruled its prior problematic decision in Azzarello v. Black Brothers, 391 A.2d 1020 (Pa. 1978). Tincher I criticized Azzarello for “approv[ing], and thereby essentially requir[ing], instructions which… read more