News
October 16, 2023
Thomas, Thomas & Hafer Welcomes Mate Jurkovic to its Washington, DC Office
Thomas, Thomas & Hafer is pleased to announce that Mate Jurkovic has joined the firm’s general liability practice group in the Washington, DC office. Mate is a graduate of Loyola University of Chicago, where he earned a bachelor’s degree in international studies. He is also a graduate of the University of Pittsburgh School of Law,… read more
October 09, 2023
Thomas, Thomas & Hafer Welcomes Lucas J. Duty to its Baltimore, Maryland Office
Thomas, Thomas & Hafer (“TT&H”) is pleased to announce that Lucas J. Duty has joined the firm’s general liability practice group in the Baltimore, Maryland office. Before joining TT&H, Lucas worked at a mid-sized firm in Baltimore County, focusing on family law. While with that firm, Lucas handled a variety of family law matters throughout… read more
October 02, 2023
eNotes: Liability – October 2023 – Pennsylvania
SIGNIFICANT CASE SUMMARIES Pennsylvania Case Summaries Johnson v. Toll Bros. Pennsylvania Superior Court 2023 Pa. Super. 181 Decided: September 26, 2023 Plaintiffs’ tort claims were barred by the economic loss doctrine, the gist of the action doctrine and/or the applicable statute of limitations. Background Construction Company, who designed and constructed the home at issue, installed… read more
October 02, 2023
eNotes: Liability – October 2023 – Maryland
SIGNIFICANT CASE SUMMARIES Maryland Case Summary Williams v. Morgan State Univ. Maryland Supreme Court Misc. No. 9, September Term, 2023 Md. LEXIS 339 Decided: August 14, 2023 Maryland’s waiver of sovereign immunity for tort actions held not to extended to federal statutory claims. Background Plaintiff originally filed a Complaint in the Circuit Court for Baltimore… read more
October 02, 2023
eNotes: Liability – October 2023 – Washington, D.C.
SIGNIFICANT CASE SUMMARIES Washington, DC Case Summary Gonzales v. GrubHub Holdings, Inc. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia No. 23-cv-1650 Decided: September 14, 2023 In wage dispute, an employee’s agreement to a digital employment contract was sufficient to make an arbitration provision enforceable. Background From 2018 through 2021, Plaintiff performed deliveries for Defendant… read more